Gear Up for PFAS: New EPA Limits Reshape Your Treatment Landscape 

Water Analysis for PFAs in River

Heads up, water pros! The EPA just dropped a game-changer for municipal water treatment. Their new guidelines on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) – those “forever chemicals” plaguing our water sources – are here, and they’re setting stricter limits than ever before

As guardians of your city’s tap water, you know the importance of keeping contaminants at bay. These new regulations raise the bar for PFAS removal, impacting how we approach treatment at the source. 

The Specifics 

The EPA is cracking down on five specific PFAS compounds: PFOA and PFOS (with a limit of 4 parts per trillion) and PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA (at 10 parts per trillion). These levels are ridiculously tiny – imagine a single drop in 20 Olympic pools! But for public health, every part matters. 

The good news: the EPA recognizes the challenge. They’ve identified proven methods like activated carbon filtration, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange as effective against PFAS. Additionally, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has allocated a $10 billion to help cities upgrade their treatment capabilities. 

Time to Strategize: What’s Next for Your Plant? 

The compliance deadline is five years from now, giving you time to assess your current system’s PFAS removal efficiency. Here’s your action plan: 

  • Explore Treatment Options: Evaluate the efficiency of existing methods and research new technologies specifically designed for PFAS removal. Pilot testing different options will help you find the best fit for your plant’s needs and budget. 

The Bottom Line: A Collaborative Effort for Safe Water 

These new guidelines are a win for public health, but they require a united front from water treatment professionals. By working closely with the EPA and leveraging available resources, we can ensure that every city resident has access to clean, PFAS-free tap water. Remember, you’re the frontline heroes, and with these new guidelines, you have the tools to deliver the ultimate victory: safe drinking water for all. 

EPA Imposes First Limits on PFAS

Polluted Water with PFAs

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this week introduced new national drinking water standards, marking a significant regulatory step to limit exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.” These substances, which have been linked to various health risks including cancer and liver disease, are notoriously persistent in the environment and human body. Under the new regulations, six types of PFAS—PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, GenX chemicals, and additional combinations—are now subject to stringent limits due to their health risks. The EPA has set the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) at 4 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS, and 10 parts per trillion for PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX chemicals.

This regulatory action follows mounting evidence of PFAS’ adverse health impacts, such as increased risks of kidney and liver cancer, immune system damage, and developmental issues in children. The EPA’s decision aims to reduce these health risks by enforcing lower contamination levels and requiring public water systems to undertake significant testing and treatment if levels exceed these new standards.

The implementation of these limits is expected to impact between 6% to 10% of the nation’s public water systems, translating to a need for upgrades and treatment technologies across approximately 4,100 to 6,700 systems. This undertaking underscores the EPA’s commitment to public health, with anticipated benefits including the prevention of thousands of deaths and serious illnesses.

To support the compliance with these new standards, the EPA has allocated significant funding, notably $1 billion from the 2021 federal infrastructure law. This funding aims to assist states, territories, and public water systems in implementing PFAS testing and treatment solutions. Additional financial support has stemmed from litigation against PFAS manufacturers, including a notable settlement where companies like 3M have agreed to pay billions to affected water providers.

While these new regulations represent a critical step towards safeguarding drinking water, they also highlight ongoing challenges. The treatment and monitoring of PFAS are costly and complex, and the financial burden may ultimately be passed onto consumers, especially in smaller communities with fewer resources. 

These actions are part of a broader effort by the EPA to tackle environmental contaminants and ensure cleaner, safer water for all Americans. As the agency continues to expand its oversight and regulation of PFAS, further measures and funding will likely be necessary to address the pervasive challenges posed by these chemicals in the environment.

Resources:
NBC
AP
NPR

Spiked: Pharmaceuticals and Illicit Drugs in Water Systems

pharmaceuticals and drugs

Water treatment professionals are increasingly dealing with
a relatively new rival to traditional pollutants: the presence of both legal
and illegal drugs in water systems. Recent investigations have revealed that
substances such as fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, and a range of
pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) are increasingly contaminating aquatic
environments, posing significant risks to human health and ecological systems.

In San Francisco, a novel wastewater testing program has
provided unprecedented insights into the city’s drug usage patterns, revealing
alarming levels of potent substances like fentanyl and methamphetamine in local
wastewater. This initiative, which began in November 2023, marked the city’s
worst year for overdose deaths, with 806 fatalities attributed to accidental
overdoses. By analyzing wastewater samples from various city locations, health
officials aim to monitor drug supply and use trends, thereby enabling more
effective public health responses. This method of surveillance, which was also
employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscores the evolving strategies
cities are adopting to address public health crises.

Meanwhile, Las Vegas has encountered similar issues, with
water scientists detecting increased concentrations of party drugs and
medications in the water following major events like the Electric Daisy
Carnival and the NFL draft. These findings are particularly concerning given
the city’s reliance on recycling all indoor water, including sewage, to
mitigate the effects of the ongoing megadrought in the West. While the
treatment processes in Southern Nevada are deemed effective in removing these
drugs from the water, the long-term ecological impacts, especially on fish and
marine life, remain a source of concern.

PhACs, identified as emerging micropollutants, originate
from various sources, including the pharmaceutical industry, hospitals, and
agricultural runoff. Found in concentrations ranging from nanograms to
micrograms per liter in wastewater treatment plant effluents, PhACs can cause
acute and chronic harm to wildlife. Addressing this issue, wastewater treatment
technologies such as bioremediation, adsorption, and advanced oxidation
processes have been explored for their efficacy in removing PhACs. Notably, membrane
bioreactors (MBRs) have shown removal efficiencies of up to 99%, presenting a
promising solution for minimizing pharmaceutical pollution.

The advent of these pollutants in water systems highlights
the need for innovative treatment solutions that can address a wide range of
contaminants, including novel drugs and PhACs. As cities like San Francisco and
Las Vegas pioneer wastewater testing for drug surveillance, the water treatment
industry must adapt and evolve its technologies to combat this emerging threat.
The development of new bioremediation techniques and the investigation of
green, eco-friendly alternatives are critical steps toward ensuring the safety
and sustainability of our water resources. As water treatment professionals
continue to confront these issues, their efforts will be instrumental in
safeguarding both human communities and natural ecosystems from the adverse
effects of drug pollution.

Resources:
KQED
Review Journal
Chemosphere

“Forever Chemicals” Proving to be Regulatory Nightmare

Analyst testing for PFAS in river

Much like the chemicals themselves, PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) continue to be a never-ending regulatory nightmare for agencies and states that wish to ban or limit the use of these substances. Known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistent nature in the environment, PFAS pose serious health risks, including cancer, liver disease, and fetal complications. These substances are found in a wide range of consumer products, from food packaging to firefighting foams, making their regulation a critical concern for water treatment professionals and public health advocates alike.

A notable case involved the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) attempt to ban plastic containers manufactured by Houston-based Inhance, which were found to be contaminated with PFOA, a toxic PFAS compound. Despite the EPA’s December prohibition, the conservative fifth circuit court of appeals overturned the ban, citing that the EPA could not regulate the containers under the statute it used. The court’s decision highlighted the challenges in regulating existing industrial processes as “new” when they’ve been in use for decades. This ruling underscores the complexities of implementing PFAS regulations and the legal interpretations that can stall protective measures.

In Colorado, efforts to strengthen PFAS legislation by 2028 have been met with enthusiasm from environmental litigators and concern for public health. Senate Bill 24-081 aims to extend the ban on class B firefighting foam to other PFAS-containing products, reflecting the growing awareness of PFAS as a major public health threat. Environmental Litigation Group associate attorney Yahn Olson highlighted the difficulty of filtering PFAS from groundwater, emphasizing the chemicals’ association with severe health conditions. This legislative push in Colorado is part of a broader move towards stringent PFAS limits, with the EPA considering setting the threshold at 4 parts per trillion, signaling a shift towards recognizing any PFAS exposure as potentially harmful.

On a positive note, 3M, a Minnesota-based chemical manufacturer, has agreed to begin payments this summer to many U.S. public drinking water systems as part of a multi-billion-dollar settlement over PFAS contamination. This settlement, approved by the U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, signifies a significant step towards addressing PFAS contamination in drinking water. The payouts, ranging from $10.5 billion to $12.5 billion through 2036, reflect the company’s commitment to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. This move by 3M could serve as a precedent for other manufacturers, encouraging more comprehensive solutions to the PFAS challenge.

These developments illustrate the multifaceted approach states are taking to regulate PFAS, from legal battles to legislative reforms and settlements. Despite the challenges, the persistence of regulators, litigators, and lawmakers in addressing PFAS contamination highlights a collective effort to mitigate the environmental and health impacts of these hazardous chemicals. For water treatment professionals, these cases provide valuable insights into the evolving regulatory landscape and the ongoing efforts to ensure the safety of public water supplies from PFAS contamination.

Resources:
The Guardian
Longmont Leader
CBS News

Microplastics: Macro Problems

Plastics in Ocean

In the evolving landscape of water treatment, the emergence of microplastics as a contaminant has become a pressing concern for professionals in the field. As particles smaller than five millimeters, microplastics’ pervasive presence in global water supplies is not only an environmental issue but also a public health challenge. This article delves into the multifaceted approach water treatment professionals are adopting to navigate the challenges and solutions in removing microplastics from water supplies.

Recent studies have highlighted the ubiquity of microplastics in various water sources, including rivers, lakes, and even tap water. Originating from a variety of sources such as cosmetic products, clothing fibers, and larger plastic debris that degrades over time, these particles have been found to carry toxic substances, posing potential risks to aquatic life and human health.

One of the primary challenges in tackling microplastics is their detection. Traditional water treatment processes are not designed to capture particles as small and varied as microplastics. The lack of standardized methods for monitoring and quantifying these particles further complicates efforts to assess and manage their presence in water supplies.

In response to this challenge, water treatment professionals are exploring a range of innovative solutions. Advanced filtration techniques, such as membrane filtration and biofiltration, have shown promise in capturing microplastics. Research into nanotechnology and magnetic separation methods also offers potential pathways for more effective removal processes.

Moreover, the development of bio-based solutions, utilizing microorganisms that can degrade or assimilate microplastics, represents an exciting frontier in water treatment technology. These solutions not only aim to remove microplastics but also to convert them into harmless or even beneficial materials.

Amid these technological advances, the regulatory landscape concerning microplastics is still in its infancy. Some countries have begun to establish guidelines for monitoring microplastics in water sources, but a global consensus on acceptable levels and standardized testing methods remains elusive. Water treatment professionals are actively participating in discussions and research to inform policy development and ensure that water quality standards evolve to address this emerging contaminant effectively.

Collaboration among researchers, technology developers, policymakers, and the water treatment community is crucial for advancing the fight against microplastics. Sharing knowledge and best practices, as well as fostering public awareness of the sources and impacts of microplastics, are vital components of a comprehensive strategy to reduce their presence in water supplies.

As water treatment professionals continue to navigate the challenges posed by microplastics, their role in safeguarding public health and environmental integrity has never been more critical. The path forward will require a sustained commitment to innovation, collaboration, and education. By harnessing emerging technologies and advocating for informed policy measures, the water treatment community can make significant strides in mitigating the impact of microplastics on our water and our world.

The issue of microplastics in water supplies presents a complex challenge that demands a multifaceted response. Through continued research, technological innovation, and collaborative efforts to shape effective regulations, water treatment professionals are at the forefront of ensuring that our water remains safe for generations to come.

Resources:
EPA
WHO

EPA Inches Closer to “Forever Chemical” Regulations

Water Test for PFAs

Over the last year no subject has quite dominated the world of Water Treatment like the issue of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water, or “Forever Chemicals” as they’ve come to be known in the mainstream media.  Introducing stringent national standards aimed at significantly reducing the public health risks associated with these chemicals. The EPA’s recent proposal sets forth the first-ever national drinking water standard targeting six specific PFAS chemicals, a move poised to enforce stringent monitoring and regulation to mitigate the widespread contamination of water supplies.

PFAS have been linked to various adverse health effects in an ever increasing amount of studies, prompting the EPA to propose enforceable limits particularly for two well-known compounds: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). The proposed regulation stipulates a maximum contamination level at 4 parts per trillion, the lowest level reliably measurable by current technologies. Additionally, the regulation aims to address the cumulative risk of four other PFAS compounds—PFNA, PFHxS, PFBS, and GenX Chemicals—utilizing a hazard index calculation to evaluate their combined impact on public health.

This regulatory initiative mandates that public water systems nationwide monitor these six PFAS chemicals, ensuring compliance with the established limits and, where necessary, take corrective action to reduce PFAS concentrations in drinking water. The EPA’s commitment is grounded in a science-based approach, aiming to furnish states and local communities with the necessary guidance to safeguard public health while aligning with comprehensive efforts to limit PFAS exposure.

In conjunction with setting drinking water standards, the EPA has actively expanded its regulatory framework under the PFAS Strategic Roadmap. This plan outlines a holistic approach to tackling PFAS contamination, emphasizing the importance of understanding the full lifecycle of these substances, preventing future environmental releases, and accelerating remediation efforts for impacted sites. The Roadmap articulates key strategies, including enhancing PFAS monitoring, advancing scientific research, and developing innovative treatment technologies to remove or destroy PFAS compounds effectively.

The agency’s regulatory actions reflect a robust commitment to addressing the complex challenges posed by PFAS, leveraging a broad spectrum of regulatory, scientific, and enforcement tools. These efforts are particularly crucial given the widespread use of PFAS in various industrial applications and consumer products, which have historically contributed to the persistent environmental presence of these toxic substances.

The EPA’s decisive step to establish national drinking water standards for PFAS marks a significant milestone in the ongoing effort to safeguard public health against these hazardous chemicals. The EPA aims to reduce the prevalence of PFAS in drinking water and mitigate their long-term health impacts, ensuring safer water for all communities. Water treatment professionals and public health officials are closely monitoring these developments, as the new standards will necessitate advanced treatment solutions, rigorous monitoring protocols, and enhanced public communication strategies to manage PFAS risks effectively. The regulatory emphasis on PFAS underscores the urgent need for strategies to protect water quality and public health from these enduring contaminants.

Resources:
EPA
Crowell
Fronteras Desk
The Center Square

A Simple Solution to Microplastics?

Water sample contaminated with microplastics

Recent research has unveiled a surprisingly straightforward method for mitigating nano- and microplastics (NMPs) contamination in drinking water, an issue increasingly plaguing our water supplies. This method, which aligns well with the principles of simplicity and cost-effectiveness desired in water treatment processes, involves the mere act of boiling calcium-rich tap water and subsequently filtering it. Such a procedure, as highlighted in a study published in ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology Letters, demonstrates the potential to eliminate nearly 90% of NMPs from water.

NMPs, varying in size from a mere one-thousandth of a millimeter to as large as 5 millimeters, are omnipresent in various environments, including water, soil, and air. The health implications of these particles are a growing concern, particularly their potential impact on the human gut microbiome. While advanced filtration systems exist that can tackle NMPs, the quest for accessible, inexpensive solutions is critical for widespread application and significant reduction in human plastic ingestion.

The innovative approach explored by researchers Zhanjun Li, Eddy Zeng, and their team hinges on the interaction between boiling water and the calcium compounds typically found in hard tap water. Their experiments, conducted with tap water samples from Guangzhou, China, involved spiking the water with NMPs, boiling it for five minutes, and allowing it to cool before assessing the remaining plastic content. They discovered that boiling facilitates the formation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) incrustants, which encase the plastic particles, allowing them to be subsequently removed either through natural sedimentation or by a simple filtration step, like using a coffee filter.

This encapsulation process is particularly effective in hard water, where higher levels of calcium carbonate are present. The research indicated that in water samples containing 300 milligrams of CaCO3 per liter, up to 90% of NMPs could be removed post-boiling. Remarkably, the method still had efficacy in softer water samples, achieving a reduction of around 25% of NMPs.

For water treatment professionals, the implications of this research are profound yet implementable. This method presents a scalable, low-cost strategy that can be integrated into existing water treatment frameworks, especially in regions with hard water. It could serve as a preliminary treatment step, reducing the load on more advanced and expensive filtration systems downstream. The scalability of this method could be enhanced by adapting existing infrastructure to include boiling and filtration stages specifically designed for NMP removal.

Moreover, this approach encourages further exploration into the relationship between water hardness and other water treatment methodologies, potentially unveiling more such straightforward, efficient solutions. It also underscores the importance of interdisciplinary research, combining principles from chemistry, environmental science, and engineering to tackle pressing environmental health issues.

The study provides a promising avenue for water treatment professionals to explore, offering a simple, cost-effective, and scalable method to significantly reduce NMPs in drinking water. Its integration into existing water treatment protocols could not only enhance the efficiency of removing contaminants but also contribute to the broader goal of safeguarding public health and preserving the integrity of our water resources. As the fight against plastic pollution intensifies, simple solutions like this will be crucial in shaping the future of water treatment and environmental stewardship.

Resources: Environmental Science & Technology

World Water Day: How Far We’ve Come

World Water Day

World Water Day is coming up on March 22, 2024, marking 31 years since its beginning in 1993. At that time about 60% of the world’s population had access to clean water. A mere three decades later that number has risen to 75%, an increase including billions of people worldwide. Today we delve into the advancements in technology, policy, and community engagement that have propelled forward the accessibility of safe water, transforming lives and ecosystems across the globe. 

One of the most notable advancements in the quest for universal access to clean drinking water has been the development and deployment of low-cost and accessible technologies. From solar-powered water purification systems to portable, cheap filtration devices, innovation has been at the forefront of tackling water scarcity and contamination issues. For instance, reverse osmosis and UV purification systems have become more affordable and efficient, enabling their use in remote and resource-limited settings. These technologies not only purify water but also do so in a sustainable manner, aligning with global efforts to combat climate change. 

Another significant technological breakthrough has been the advent of real-time water quality monitoring systems. These systems employ sensors and remote communication technologies to provide instant data on water safety, allowing for prompt action to prevent contamination. Such advancements have revolutionized the way water quality is managed, ensuring safer drinking water for communities worldwide. 

Parallel to technological innovations, there have been substantial policy and infrastructure improvements aimed at expanding access to clean water. International agreements and national policies have increasingly recognized water as a fundamental human right, leading to more targeted and coordinated efforts to address water scarcity and pollution. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 6, have galvanized global action to ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030. 

Governments and international organizations have ramped up investments in water infrastructure, from the construction of modern treatment facilities to the rehabilitation of aging pipelines and sewage systems. These investments have been critical in expanding access to clean water, particularly in urban areas where the demand for safe water continues to grow. 

Advances in access to clean drinking water have also been driven by increased community engagement and education. Grassroots movements, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and local governments have played pivotal roles in raising awareness about water issues, advocating for policy change, and implementing community-based water projects. Education programs focusing on water conservation, hygiene, and sanitation have empowered communities to take an active role in managing their water resources, leading to sustainable water use practices and improved public health outcomes. 

Community-driven water projects, such as rainwater harvesting and the restoration of traditional water systems, have demonstrated the power of local knowledge and participation in achieving water security. These initiatives often incorporate traditional practices with modern technologies, creating resilient and adaptable water management systems.  
 
Despite the progress made, challenges remain in ensuring universal access to clean drinking water. Population growth, political instability, and industrial pollution continue to strain water resources, highlighting the need for continued innovation and collaboration. The water treatment industry plays a crucial role in this endeavor, offering expertise, technologies, and solutions to address the complex challenges of water scarcity and contamination. 

As we move forward, the integration of advanced technologies, robust policy frameworks, and community involvement will be critical in overcoming these challenges. The water treatment industry must continue to innovate, not just in terms of technological solutions but also in how these solutions are implemented and scaled globally. Collaboration across sectors and disciplines will be essential in ensuring that the advances made in the last thirty years serve as a foundation for a future where access to clean drinking water is a reality for all. The strides made towards improving access to clean drinking water over the last thirty years represent a remarkable achievement, but the battle is far from over. For water treatment professionals, the task ahead is not just about sustaining the momentum but accelerating it, ensuring that the next decades are marked by even greater achievements in providing safe, accessible water to every corner of the globe. 
 

Resources: WSJNatGeoOur World in Data

New AI Systems Increase Efficiency in Identifying Contaminants

Engineer with Ai

The escalation of pharmaceutical consumption globally has led to an increasing presence of trace substances in sewage and wastewater treatment plants. These substances, often remnants from metabolized pharmaceuticals, pose significant challenges due to their potential harmful effects on both environmental and human health. A groundbreaking approach by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology uses artificial intelligence (AI) to identify and predict the behavior of these emerging contaminants. 

The KIST team’s innovative use of AI represents a significant leap forward in the water treatment sector’s ability to manage and mitigate pharmaceutical contaminants. By employing self-organizing maps, a form of AI that clusters data based on similarities, researchers can now classify known trace substances, such as medicinal compounds caffeine, and even illicit drugs, by their physicochemical properties. This method not only streamlines the identification process but also enables the prediction of how these substances behave in water sources. 

Further enhancing this AI application, the KIST research team utilized random forests, another machine learning technique, to predict the properties and concentration changes of new trace substances with remarkable accuracy. This predictive model far surpasses the capabilities of traditional AI techniques, offering a precision level of about 0.75 compared to the previous 0.40. This advancement allows for a more efficient understanding of how new contaminants might affect wastewater treatment processes. 

Traditional methods of analyzing trace substances in wastewater are not only time-consuming and costly but also require extensive expert knowledge. The AI model developed by KIST, however, offers a data-driven alternative that efficiently predicts the concentration changes of new trace substances based on their physicochemical properties. This approach represents a significant improvement in both speed and accuracy over conventional prediction methods. 

The potential applications of this AI model extend beyond laboratory research. Water treatment facilities dealing with emerging contaminants can benefit from this technology, enabling them to quickly adapt treatment processes in response to new threats. Moreover, this model can aid in the formulation of regulations and policies by providing rapid, accurate data on the behavior of pharmaceutical contaminants. 

The integration of AI into the identification and prediction of pharmaceutical contaminants in wastewater signals a new era in water treatment technology. As this model continues to evolve, its increasing accuracy—bolstered by the accumulation of relevant data—will offer water treatment professionals a powerful tool in safeguarding environmental and public health. The work of Dr. Seokwon Hong, Dr. Moon Son, and their team at KIST not only highlights the potential of AI in environmental management but also paves the way for future advancements in water treatment efficiency and safety.  

ResourcesEPAEnvironmental Chemistry Branch EPAPHYS ORG

More Trouble for Jackson’s Water Supply

E.coli Water Contamination

The city of Jackson, Mississippi, finds itself grappling with yet another water crisis. Following last year’s significant water supply challenges and a crisis that made national news in August of 2022, the recent boil water notice issued for the city and surrounding areas has reignited concerns over the reliability of its water infrastructure. City officials say that they are doing everything in their power and making improvements, however some residents are still wary.  

The Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH) issued a citywide boil water notice for Jackson on Thursday after E. coli was detected in two water samples submitted by JXN Water, Jackson’s third-party water manager. This notice coincided with a similar advisory for Flowood, raising questions about the water quality in the region. The Health Department’s decision was met with criticism from JXN Water’s Ted Henifin, who questioned the validity of the results and criticized the MSDH for not confirming the results before public announcement, as allowed under federal guidelines through the Environmental Protection Agency. 

Henifin, during a press conference, argued against the likelihood of both Jackson and Flowood having E. coli contamination simultaneously and suggested the results could be false positives. In response, MSDH maintained confidence in the test results’ validity. However, the boil water notice for Jackson was lifted swiftly, diverging from the usual protocol that typically requires two consecutive days of clean samples. MSDH officials affirmed their stance behind the initial test results, citing a history of E. coli instances in Jackson’s water system since 2003. This quick reversal in decision-making contrasts starkly with last year’s prolonged water crisis, reflecting ongoing challenges in managing Jackson’s water safety effectively. 

The lifting of the citywide notice did not mark a complete resolution, as Jackson still faces active boil water notices due to loss of pressure in certain areas, affecting hundreds of customers. These ongoing issues are a stark reminder of the fragility of Jackson’s water infrastructure, which has been a point of contention and difficulty for years. In preparation for the ongoing cold weather JXN Water has been proactively upgrading the city’s water treatment facilities after a severe failure last winter. These upgrades, including covering and insulating the facilities, are direct responses to the December 2022 water shutdown, when exposed equipment failed amid freezing temperatures, leading to a significant drop in water pressure throughout Jackson. 

Jackson’s officials, including Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba, are also advising residents to take preventive measures at home, like letting faucets drip and opening cabinets to prevent pipe freezing. The city is preparing for potential snow and icy conditions by cautioning residents to stay home and by setting up a temporary shelter for those in need. The recent boil water notice in Jackson, coming on the heels of last year’s prolonged water crisis, highlights the ongoing challenges faced by the city in ensuring a reliable and safe water supply. While the quick resolution of the recent notice shows an improvement in response, the underlying issues of aging infrastructure and vulnerability to extreme weather conditions remain pressing concerns.  

SOURCES: Mississippi TodayWAPTMSDH MS