Under the LCRR, public water systems must submit a comprehensive inventory of service line materials, identifying lead lines, galvanized lines requiring replacement, and unknown materials by the compliance deadline. This inventory is a critical step toward meeting regulatory requirements and mitigating lead exposure. The guidance provided by the EPA emphasizes the importance of transparency and communication with the public regarding the location and condition of lead service lines.

Additionally, the LCRR introduces new public notification requirements. In the event of a Lead Action Level exceedance, communitywide public notification must occur within 24 hours. This requirement underscores the urgency of addressing lead contamination and maintaining public trust. Stephen Estes-Smargiassi, chair of the American Water Works Association’s (AWWA) Lead and Copper Rule Advisory Committee, advises water utilities to proactively engage with public officials, media, and other stakeholders before starting the sampling process to avoid surprises and ensure clear communication.

The EPA has released several resources to help water systems comply with the LCRR. The Guidance for Developing and Maintaining a Service Line Inventory provides best practices, a template for creating inventories, and case studies to assist water systems in meeting the October 16 deadline. The Small Entity Compliance Guide, released in June 2023, is tailored to support small community and non-transient non-community water systems. Additionally, the EPA has hosted webinars to educate professionals on the revised rule and funding opportunities through programs like the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL).

With six months remaining, water treatment professionals should focus on several key actions to ensure compliance with the LCRR:

1.       Develop a Comprehensive Service Line Inventory: This step involves identifying all lead and galvanized lines and creating a plan for replacement. The inventory must be submitted by October 16, 2024.

2.       Communicate with Stakeholders: Proactive communication with public officials, health departments, and community members is essential. Ensure that everyone is aware of the new requirements and the steps being taken to comply with the LCRR.

3.       Prepare for Public Notification Requirements: Establish a process for communitywide public notification within 24 hours of a Lead Action Level exceedance. This requires coordination with media outlets, public officials, and other stakeholders.

4.       Stay Informed and Utilize Available Resources: The EPA provides extensive guidance and resources to support compliance efforts. Take advantage of webinars, templates, and other materials to ensure compliance.

The clock is ticking, so it’s crucial to act now to ensure compliance by October 16, 2024.

Resources:
AWWA
EPA
OpenGov

The post Six Months Left to Comply with Lead and Copper Rule Revisions appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

While wastewater testing is touted as a non-invasive way to
gauge public health, critics argue that it still constitutes an invasion of
privacy. The method does not identify individual drug users but does inform on
the collective habits of those who use the school facilities—including
students, staff, and visitors. This broad sweep, which captures data from all
users indiscriminately, could be seen as a blanket surveillance tactic that
encroaches on personal privacy.

Critics might question the ethics of monitoring without
direct consent from those being tested, even if the individuals remain
anonymous. The essence of the concern lies in the fact that the very act of
testing can be seen as a breach of trust, particularly in educational
institutions where students are meant to feel safe and protected.

Another significant concern is the potential stigmatization
of schools and communities based on the results of these tests. Positive
results for drugs like cocaine or fentanyl could label schools as high-risk
areas, affecting perceptions among parents, prospective students, and the wider
community. This stigma could deter individuals from seeking help for addiction
or associating with stigmatized institutions, fearing societal backlash or
discrimination.

The risk extends to entire neighborhoods or towns,
especially in smaller or more tightly-knit communities where schools are often
central hubs of activity and pride. Such stigma can have long-lasting effects
on community cohesion and individual well-being, potentially leading to social
isolation or decreased property values.

There is also a palpable concern that the data from
wastewater testing could be used more for punitive measures rather than as a
basis for support and harm reduction. If schools and law enforcement agencies
focus on penalizing users rather than understanding and addressing the root
causes of drug use, such initiatives could undermine trust and deter students
from seeking necessary help.

The approach taken to communicate and act on the findings is
crucial. Public health officials, like New Mexico’s Secretary of Health Patrick
Allen, emphasize the need to refine messaging and intervention strategies.
However, without a clear framework that prioritizes health and educational
support over disciplinary action, there is a risk that findings could lead to
harsher school policies or increased surveillance.

The ethical considerations of wastewater testing in schools
revolve around balancing the benefits of public health surveillance against the
potential harm to individual privacy and community integrity. To navigate these
concerns ethically, transparency with the public about how data will be used,
along with robust community engagement and dialogue about the goals and methods
of such testing, is essential.

Furthermore, the focus should ideally shift towards creating
supportive environments that encourage open discussions about drug use, mental
health, and addiction. Schools should be equipped with resources to support
students in need—such as counseling services and educational programs on
substance abuse—rather than using the data as a basis for exclusion or
punishment.

As New Mexico and other states consider expanding such
programs, it will be crucial to continually assess these ethical dimensions and
strive for approaches that respect individual privacy, prevent stigmatization,
and genuinely support public health in a compassionate and constructive manner.

Resources:
Science of The Total Environment
KOAT
Scripps News
KOB

The post Wastewater Drug Testing: Public Health Tool or Government Overreach? appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

NAWI’s mission, supported by this funding, is to address the critical technical barriers that currently hinder the cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency of water purification technologies. By fostering collaborations among industry, government, and academic partners, NAWI aims to propel significant advancements in desalination technologies. These advancements are crucial for modernizing America’s water infrastructure, increasing access to clean, potable water, and aligning with the national goal of achieving a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.

The relevance of this initiative is magnified by the interconnectedness of water and energy systems. Water is essential for producing nearly every major energy source, and energy is indispensable for transporting and treating water. The integrated approach that the DOE is advocating through NAWI is designed to synergize efforts to decarbonize the water economy while ensuring secure water futures for communities across the nation.

For water treatment professionals, the focus of NAWI on piloting integrated energy-efficient and decarbonized water systems is particularly pertinent. This approach not only addresses the immediate needs of treating and delivering water but also emphasizes the reuse of various wastewaters. Such initiatives are vital in a landscape where traditional fresh water supplies are increasingly strained by environmental and demographic pressures.

Over the past five years, NAWI has already made significant strides by funding over 60 projects that span early-stage research to pilot-scale implementations. These projects have explored a range of innovative water treatment and desalination unit processes, automation technologies, and novel modeling tools and analysis. The outcomes from these projects have contributed to the development of the NAWI Master Roadmap and five sector-specific roadmaps addressing key challenges in desalination and the treatment of nontraditional source waters.

Looking ahead, NAWI 2.0 aims to deepen its impact by focusing on three primary challenges: Increasing the focus on piloting integrated systems that are not only energy-efficient but also geared towards decarbonization, emphasizing the reuse of a variety of wastewaters, which is increasingly recognized as critical for sustainable water management, convening stakeholders—including technology developers, water managers, and community representatives—to optimize water supply management through collaborative innovation.

This strategic direction promises to open new avenues for technological development and implementation in the water treatment sector. Water treatment professionals will need to adapt to and engage with these emerging technologies, which will require a combination of technical expertise and strategic thinking. The ability to integrate new processes into existing frameworks, to innovate within regulatory and economic constraints, and to anticipate future water quality challenges will be key to leveraging the opportunities presented by NAWI’s initiatives.

Furthermore, NAWI’s extensive community, comprising 108 Research Consortium member organizations and over 424 Alliance Organizations, provides a robust network for collaboration and knowledge exchange. This network is an invaluable resource for professionals looking to stay at the forefront of water treatment technology.

The DOE’s renewed funding for NAWI represents a significant commitment to transforming the landscape of water treatment in the United States. For water treatment professionals, this initiative not only challenges them to innovate but also offers a platform to significantly influence the future of sustainable water management.

Resources:
Department of Energy

The post DOE Announces $75 Million Investment in Desalination and Water Reuse Technologies appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

This regulatory action follows mounting evidence of PFAS’ adverse health impacts, such as increased risks of kidney and liver cancer, immune system damage, and developmental issues in children. The EPA’s decision aims to reduce these health risks by enforcing lower contamination levels and requiring public water systems to undertake significant testing and treatment if levels exceed these new standards.

The implementation of these limits is expected to impact between 6% to 10% of the nation’s public water systems, translating to a need for upgrades and treatment technologies across approximately 4,100 to 6,700 systems. This undertaking underscores the EPA’s commitment to public health, with anticipated benefits including the prevention of thousands of deaths and serious illnesses.

To support the compliance with these new standards, the EPA has allocated significant funding, notably $1 billion from the 2021 federal infrastructure law. This funding aims to assist states, territories, and public water systems in implementing PFAS testing and treatment solutions. Additional financial support has stemmed from litigation against PFAS manufacturers, including a notable settlement where companies like 3M have agreed to pay billions to affected water providers.

While these new regulations represent a critical step towards safeguarding drinking water, they also highlight ongoing challenges. The treatment and monitoring of PFAS are costly and complex, and the financial burden may ultimately be passed onto consumers, especially in smaller communities with fewer resources. 

These actions are part of a broader effort by the EPA to tackle environmental contaminants and ensure cleaner, safer water for all Americans. As the agency continues to expand its oversight and regulation of PFAS, further measures and funding will likely be necessary to address the pervasive challenges posed by these chemicals in the environment.

Resources:
NBC
AP
NPR

The post EPA Imposes First Limits on PFAS appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

The highlight of Water Week, the National Water Policy Fly-In
on April 9, 2024, brings together 350 water sector professionals from across
the United States. Representatives from associations, public water utilities,
and policy experts will convene in Congressional office visits, advocating for
pivotal changes and increased federal support for water infrastructure. This
collective effort, spearheaded by leading organizations such as the National
Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA), the Water Environment Federation
(WEF), the Water Research Foundation (WRF), and the WaterReuse Association,
underscores the urgent need for addressing aging infrastructure, PFAS
regulation costs, and other critical issues facing the sector.

In addition to legislative advocacy, Water Week 2024
features events designed to engage and inform participants about the latest in
water research, policy, and operations. Notably, the Solar Eclipse Watch Party
and Community Cleanup on April 8, 2024, combines community service with a
unique astronomical event, fostering a sense of camaraderie among water
professionals. Meanwhile, the Onsite Water Reuse Summit, scheduled for April
10-11, 2024, promises insightful discussions on integrating science, policy, and
operational strategies for water reuse, featuring keynotes from industry
visionaries.

Another significant event, the WEFMAX, slated for April
10-12, 2024, in Alexandria, VA, facilitates an exchange of ideas, best
practices, and lessons learned among Water Environment Federation members. This
forum exemplifies the collaborative spirit essential for advancing the water
sector’s goals.

Moreover, the completion of the AlexRenew Tunnel marks a
milestone in efforts to protect Alexandria’s waterways. The open house on April
13, 2024, offers the public a rare opportunity to celebrate this achievement
and learn more about the innovative engineering behind it.

Central to Water Week’s agenda is the America’s Water
Affordability Imperative Congressional Briefing on April 10, 2024. This
briefing aims to shed light on the consequences of unaffordable water systems
and explore solutions to ensure no American is left without access to this
essential resource. The involvement of the Congressional Black Caucus, along
with opening remarks by Senator Alex Padilla and Congresswoman Lisa Blunt
Rochester, signifies the bipartisan importance of water affordability.

Water Week 2024 represents a concerted effort to elevate water issues on the national stage, advocating for robust funding, innovative research, and policy frameworks that support the sector’s resilience and sustainability. As professionals gather in Washington, D.C., their unified
voice emphasizes the critical role of water management in public health, environmental protection, and economic development. Through collaboration and advocacy, Water Week seeks to catalyze lasting solutions to the challenges that loom large over the water sector, ensuring a secure and sustainable water future for communities across the nation.

Resources:
WWD
Water Finance and Management

The post Water Week 2024: What’s in Store appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

In San Francisco, a novel wastewater testing program has
provided unprecedented insights into the city’s drug usage patterns, revealing
alarming levels of potent substances like fentanyl and methamphetamine in local
wastewater. This initiative, which began in November 2023, marked the city’s
worst year for overdose deaths, with 806 fatalities attributed to accidental
overdoses. By analyzing wastewater samples from various city locations, health
officials aim to monitor drug supply and use trends, thereby enabling more
effective public health responses. This method of surveillance, which was also
employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscores the evolving strategies
cities are adopting to address public health crises.

Meanwhile, Las Vegas has encountered similar issues, with
water scientists detecting increased concentrations of party drugs and
medications in the water following major events like the Electric Daisy
Carnival and the NFL draft. These findings are particularly concerning given
the city’s reliance on recycling all indoor water, including sewage, to
mitigate the effects of the ongoing megadrought in the West. While the
treatment processes in Southern Nevada are deemed effective in removing these
drugs from the water, the long-term ecological impacts, especially on fish and
marine life, remain a source of concern.

PhACs, identified as emerging micropollutants, originate
from various sources, including the pharmaceutical industry, hospitals, and
agricultural runoff. Found in concentrations ranging from nanograms to
micrograms per liter in wastewater treatment plant effluents, PhACs can cause
acute and chronic harm to wildlife. Addressing this issue, wastewater treatment
technologies such as bioremediation, adsorption, and advanced oxidation
processes have been explored for their efficacy in removing PhACs. Notably, membrane
bioreactors (MBRs) have shown removal efficiencies of up to 99%, presenting a
promising solution for minimizing pharmaceutical pollution.

The advent of these pollutants in water systems highlights
the need for innovative treatment solutions that can address a wide range of
contaminants, including novel drugs and PhACs. As cities like San Francisco and
Las Vegas pioneer wastewater testing for drug surveillance, the water treatment
industry must adapt and evolve its technologies to combat this emerging threat.
The development of new bioremediation techniques and the investigation of
green, eco-friendly alternatives are critical steps toward ensuring the safety
and sustainability of our water resources. As water treatment professionals
continue to confront these issues, their efforts will be instrumental in
safeguarding both human communities and natural ecosystems from the adverse
effects of drug pollution.

Resources:
KQED
Review Journal
Chemosphere

The post Spiked: Pharmaceuticals and Illicit Drugs in Water Systems appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

A notable case involved the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) attempt to ban plastic containers manufactured by Houston-based Inhance, which were found to be contaminated with PFOA, a toxic PFAS compound. Despite the EPA’s December prohibition, the conservative fifth circuit court of appeals overturned the ban, citing that the EPA could not regulate the containers under the statute it used. The court’s decision highlighted the challenges in regulating existing industrial processes as “new” when they’ve been in use for decades. This ruling underscores the complexities of implementing PFAS regulations and the legal interpretations that can stall protective measures.

In Colorado, efforts to strengthen PFAS legislation by 2028 have been met with enthusiasm from environmental litigators and concern for public health. Senate Bill 24-081 aims to extend the ban on class B firefighting foam to other PFAS-containing products, reflecting the growing awareness of PFAS as a major public health threat. Environmental Litigation Group associate attorney Yahn Olson highlighted the difficulty of filtering PFAS from groundwater, emphasizing the chemicals’ association with severe health conditions. This legislative push in Colorado is part of a broader move towards stringent PFAS limits, with the EPA considering setting the threshold at 4 parts per trillion, signaling a shift towards recognizing any PFAS exposure as potentially harmful.

On a positive note, 3M, a Minnesota-based chemical manufacturer, has agreed to begin payments this summer to many U.S. public drinking water systems as part of a multi-billion-dollar settlement over PFAS contamination. This settlement, approved by the U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, signifies a significant step towards addressing PFAS contamination in drinking water. The payouts, ranging from $10.5 billion to $12.5 billion through 2036, reflect the company’s commitment to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. This move by 3M could serve as a precedent for other manufacturers, encouraging more comprehensive solutions to the PFAS challenge.

These developments illustrate the multifaceted approach states are taking to regulate PFAS, from legal battles to legislative reforms and settlements. Despite the challenges, the persistence of regulators, litigators, and lawmakers in addressing PFAS contamination highlights a collective effort to mitigate the environmental and health impacts of these hazardous chemicals. For water treatment professionals, these cases provide valuable insights into the evolving regulatory landscape and the ongoing efforts to ensure the safety of public water supplies from PFAS contamination.

Resources:
The Guardian
Longmont Leader
CBS News

The post “Forever Chemicals” Proving to be Regulatory Nightmare appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

However, a shift in perspective has led to the development of technologies aimed at nutrient recovery, particularly phosphorous and nitrogen, from sludge. This method holds promise for creating effective fertilizers from wastewater, presenting a win-win scenario for both environmental sustainability and agricultural productivity.

Technical Manager Leif Ydstebø and microbiologist Erik Norgaard have been at the forefront of these efforts. Their work involves not only the technological advancement of nutrient recovery systems but also addressing the regulatory and market challenges associated with introducing sludge-based fertilizers to farmers. Despite initial skepticism, the lower cost and environmental benefits of these organic fertilizers have piqued the interest of the farming community.

This initiative is particularly timely, given the global scarcity of phosphorous and the critical role it plays in agriculture. By recycling phosphorous and nitrogen, the water treatment sector is not only addressing environmental concerns but also contributing to global food security. The technology developed for this purpose is undergoing rigorous testing to ensure its suitability and effectiveness for various wastewater treatment facilities.

The efforts of IVAR and HØST in Norway have been exemplary, demonstrating the potential for large-scale nutrient recovery and fertilizer production. These endeavors are not just about technological innovation; they also involve navigating the complex landscape of regulatory requirements and market dynamics. Success in this area requires a stable regulatory framework and an understanding of the agricultural market, aspects that Norgaard and his team have been diligently working on.

As this technology continues to evolve, it opens up significant opportunities for the export of recovered fertilizers, further highlighting the global relevance of nutrient recovery from wastewater. The water treatment industry is at a pivotal point, where technological innovation meets environmental stewardship and agricultural needs. This convergence presents a promising path forward, offering solutions that are sustainable, economically viable, and beneficial for communities around the world.

These developments represent a significant shift towards more sustainable and resource-efficient practices in farming and water treatment. As the industry continues to evolve, the integration of nutrient recovery technologies into wastewater treatment processes will likely become a standard, underscoring the sector’s role in promoting environmental sustainability and supporting global agriculture. 

Resources:
Phys.org

The post Wastewater Nutrient Recovery for Farming appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

The White House, through a concerted effort involving multiple agencies, has spotlighted the dire need for enhanced cybersecurity measures within the water sector. EPA Administrator Michael Regan and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan have articulated concerns regarding the sector’s attractiveness as a target for cyberattacks, primarily due to its essential nature and the oftentimes limited resources and technical capacity to implement comprehensive cybersecurity practices. This vulnerability is not just theoretical; it has been manifest in numerous incidents, including attacks linked to state-sponsored entities from China and the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

A particularly alarming aspect of these cyber threats is the targeting of water and wastewater systems, pivotal in ensuring the provision of clean and safe drinking water to communities. The administration has drawn attention to two specific groups: Volt Typhoon, associated with the Chinese government, and the Cyber Av3ngers, linked to the IRGC. These entities have not only infiltrated critical infrastructure but have also demonstrated the capability to disrupt essential services, highlighting a stark reality where cybersecurity lapses can lead to significant impacts on public health and safety.

In response to these looming threats, a multifaceted strategy has been unveiled, focusing on bolstering the sector’s digital defenses. This includes the formation of a water sector cybersecurity task force, aimed at identifying vulnerabilities and developing strategies to mitigate them. Furthermore, the administration has extended invitations to state officials for discussions on improving cybersecurity measures, alongside offering resources through both the EPA and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). These efforts are indicative of a proactive stance, seeking to address and preempt the potential ramifications of cyberattacks on critical water infrastructure.

However, the path forward is not without its challenges. Past attempts to impose more stringent cybersecurity measures have faced legal and political pushback, illustrating the complex interplay between regulatory efforts and sector-specific realities. Despite these hurdles, the call for enhanced protections is underscored by a shared understanding of the critical nature of water utilities and the catastrophic potential of successful cyberattacks.

The dialogue between federal and state entities, as emphasized in recent communications, is a crucial step toward fostering a more secure and resilient water sector. By urging state governments to assess their current cybersecurity practices and engage in collaborative efforts to shore up defenses, the administration is advocating for a unified approach to safeguarding a vital component of the nation’s infrastructure.

For water treatment professionals, the message is clear: the threat landscape is evolving, and with it, the need for vigilance and proactive measures to protect against cyber intrusions. As the sector navigates these challenges, the emphasis on comprehensive cybersecurity practices, from basic measures like changing default passwords to more sophisticated strategies, becomes paramount. The ongoing efforts to secure the water sector not only reflect the importance of cybersecurity in maintaining public health and safety but also underscore the collective responsibility of all stakeholders to ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure against emerging threats.

Resources:
NextGov.com
CyberScoop.com
ArtsTechnica.com

The post EPA and White House Issue Warning on Cybersecurity in Water Infrastructure appeared first on Water Treatment 411.

Recent studies have highlighted the ubiquity of microplastics in various water sources, including rivers, lakes, and even tap water. Originating from a variety of sources such as cosmetic products, clothing fibers, and larger plastic debris that degrades over time, these particles have been found to carry toxic substances, posing potential risks to aquatic life and human health.

One of the primary challenges in tackling microplastics is their detection. Traditional water treatment processes are not designed to capture particles as small and varied as microplastics. The lack of standardized methods for monitoring and quantifying these particles further complicates efforts to assess and manage their presence in water supplies.

In response to this challenge, water treatment professionals are exploring a range of innovative solutions. Advanced filtration techniques, such as membrane filtration and biofiltration, have shown promise in capturing microplastics. Research into nanotechnology and magnetic separation methods also offers potential pathways for more effective removal processes.

Moreover, the development of bio-based solutions, utilizing microorganisms that can degrade or assimilate microplastics, represents an exciting frontier in water treatment technology. These solutions not only aim to remove microplastics but also to convert them into harmless or even beneficial materials.

Amid these technological advances, the regulatory landscape concerning microplastics is still in its infancy. Some countries have begun to establish guidelines for monitoring microplastics in water sources, but a global consensus on acceptable levels and standardized testing methods remains elusive. Water treatment professionals are actively participating in discussions and research to inform policy development and ensure that water quality standards evolve to address this emerging contaminant effectively.

Collaboration among researchers, technology developers, policymakers, and the water treatment community is crucial for advancing the fight against microplastics. Sharing knowledge and best practices, as well as fostering public awareness of the sources and impacts of microplastics, are vital components of a comprehensive strategy to reduce their presence in water supplies.

As water treatment professionals continue to navigate the challenges posed by microplastics, their role in safeguarding public health and environmental integrity has never been more critical. The path forward will require a sustained commitment to innovation, collaboration, and education. By harnessing emerging technologies and advocating for informed policy measures, the water treatment community can make significant strides in mitigating the impact of microplastics on our water and our world.

The issue of microplastics in water supplies presents a complex challenge that demands a multifaceted response. Through continued research, technological innovation, and collaborative efforts to shape effective regulations, water treatment professionals are at the forefront of ensuring that our water remains safe for generations to come.

Resources:
EPA
WHO

The post Microplastics: Macro Problems appeared first on Water Treatment 411.